© Copyright 2006 SWATDigest.com
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Illusions and Perceptions
By Tomer Benito

Awhile ago I visited a major transportation hub on the East Coast and delivered a seminar to the local security force. It wasn’t the conventional security force, but merely a police squad containing guns, badges, and uniforms—American Pride. I discussed issues about their security protocol, a collection of orders and recommendations that nobody really reads and more than that - implements.

One of the subjects that caught my attention in their protocol was the following: “When discovering an object that is obviously a bomb, it is a requirement to evacuate the area.”

I read it over and over again, searching for images and photos. Due to the absence of visualization, I grabbed one of the officers in the squad and asked, “Can you tell me what a bomb looks like?”

The officer looked at me with startled eyes and asked. “What?” he replied, not quite determining how he should answer the question..

I gave him a plain sheet of paper and pen and said, “Draw me a bomb.”

He looked at me with a stare normally seen in small kids who did something wrong. His stare changed to acquiescence when he realized that I was serious. He thought for awhile and then drew something that looked like five tubes arranged together, a round circle with a dial in the middle of the sheet, and curly lines on the edges of the tubes. Apparently satisfied with his artwork, the officer handed the drawing back to me with a grin.

Like a father examining his son’s first art piece, I studied the drawing. After a moment that took almost an eternity, my hand became numb and my patience ran out. I couldn’t determine what he drew, so without insulting his artistic skills, I asked, “What is it?”

“ It’s a bomb!” the officer said firmly with a hint of surprise for my poor recognition. “Dynamite sticks,” he said and pointed towards the tubes. “A clock,” he continued with the interpretation and rotated his finger around the circle in the middle of the page. “And wires,” he concluded gesturing toward the curly lines he drew.

I smiled in understanding and asked, “Which one is the blue wire and which one is the red?”
“ That’s the million dollar question, isn’t it?” he smiled back.

“ From where did you get this image?” I inquired. When he didn’t respond, I tried a different angle. “Have you ever seen such a bomb in reality?” I asked.

The officer replied promptly, “Not in reality, but in a lot of movies.” That was exactly the answer I was expecting.

I turned the sheet over and sketched out my own drawing (I was good at this when I was young). I drew a metal cylinder (emphasizing attention to the shiny surface) with a big square in the middle of it. I drew four shapes in the form of a digital clock. “The numbers are in red,” I informed the officer. “And it counts down, of course,” I added. He nodded. “Do you think this is also a bomb?” I asked.

“ Yes, I do,” the officer nodded in agreement.

“ So, does it matter what year the movie you saw was filmed?”

The officer looked puzzled. “What are you saying?” he asked.

I asked him this question in reply, “I’m saying that television has changed our perspective entirely. If you were the terrorist, how would your bomb look – say, something a child would recognize as a bomb, or something that nobody would suspect – something that would stay in place long enough for the execution of an explosion?”

“ It makes sense that it would be something that people are used to seeing,” the officer answered after a few seconds of deliberation.

“ So what does a bomb look like?” I asked again.

“ Like anything innocent,” he concluded.

The media changes our perspective towards things that are commonly known. Did you ever pay attention to the weapons the bad guys on TV series and movies hold? The type of weapon is almost always an AK-47. Avtomat Kalashnikova was invented in 1947 by Viktor Timofeevich Kalashnikov. It is easy to infer by its name that it’s a Russian-made rifle. Unfortunately, the Middle Eastern terrorists used this rifle in the 1970s. Some of them even drew the silhouette of this weapon on their flags. Although its existence is very rare in the US, the movie industry places it constantly in the hands of the bad guys. So are we always expecting to see them use a Russian-made weapon? Because if someone holds an M-16, he must be an undercover good guy – he can’t be a terrorist, right?

Special agent Jack Bauer of the Emmy Award winning TV series ‘24’ is another great example of the perception we lose. We count on our agencies to provide us with an up-to-date picture of the bad guy down to the current haircut or unshaved beard. In reality, as we all know, it doesn’t work that way. We watch on TV how the powerful closed circuit cameras zoom-in on the bad guy’s face and within a split second, there is a match between the bad guy and the intelligence profile we have on him. In reality, the algorithmic systems cannot do this great a job, and it takes much more than a CCTV camera to find a match. Instead of looking for the facial features match, we should look at the behavioral pattern, and we can find our bad guy because of what he does and not who he is.

Let’s take the wanted “bad guy” for instance. When he knows that he is hunted, he won’t be exposed to us. He knows that we have cameras, and law enforcement has been given his description. I asked my bomb-drawing officer what he would have done if he was the bad guy, and he replied that he would disguise himself, not necessarily with a wig, but probably with a hat and sunglasses. “Would you avoid the security cameras and law enforcement personal?” I asked him.

“ Of course I would. I’d keep my head down and walk away as fast as I could without raising suspicion,” he replied.

All of a sudden, we are not looking for the exact same man anymore. We are looking for the suspicious behavior. A man who is walking into a public area with his head down and a pair of sunglasses that covers half of his face could possibly be someone who was just dumped by his girlfriend. He could also be our bad guy. The way to determine this is by engaging him in conversation about anything. If he runs away – we have a logical reason to believe that he has something to hide…

Another aspect that is seen vastly on TV and movies is the super-computer that pin points everything. A phone call conversation from one man to another becomes the lead to a large scale hunt and an apprehension of a sleeper cell on American soil. Hilarious!!! If you were the terrorist, would you say over a phone call conversation “I’m going to blow up a place”? And if you won’t, what are the codes you use? What are the ones NSA uses to feed those super-computers?

I can make an analogy for the business world – the fish and the fishing rod.

If I provide you with one fish – you’ll eat, but you won’t survive without me.

If I provide you with a fishing rod and teach you how to fish – you won’t need me to survive.

I grew up with a TV commercial on how to identify suspicious objects. It was a commercial for kids in the early 1980s. It showed a shopping bag beneath a bus station bench. The narrator said, “A suspicious object is one that is not in its natural place, and that nobody knows to whom it belongs.” The image changed to a few other abandoned briefcases, a shoebox, and a plastic container near a playground. The narrator instructed that we shouldn’t have to determine whether the object was threatening or not but just to evacuate the area and to inform the police. Talk about kids’ empowerment!

I have a lot to say about television, but one of the worst things it does to us (except for numbing our minds, selling sex in every context, and promoting violent values), is change our perspective towards what matters the most. I wonder where Jack Bauer and CTU will be during the next terrorist strike.

Tomer Benito
Counter Terrorism Specialist